Satellites offer a way of estimating global precipitation.Errors exist inevitably in satellite precipitation products,and have a great deal of difference among products because of the complexity of estimating or retrieving precipitation.This paper firstly outlined global projects of satellite precipitation product evaluationincluding Algorithm Intercomparison Project (AIP),Product Intercomparison Project (PIP),and Program to Evaluate High Resolution Precipitation Products (PEHRPP).These projects concluded that the accuracy of precipitation products is close related with underlying surfaces,latitude,seasons and precipitation patterns.The HRPPs (TMPA、CMORPH、NRLB and GSMaP) underestimate rainfall ranging from 3 to 7 mm/day(10%~67%).PERSIANN overestimates heavy rainfall (200%) while underestimates rainfall (56%) in the mountains.Then it concluded evaluation strategies including rainfall events evaluation,evaluation at meso-small scale region and evaluation at large scale region.Evaluation methods were divided into two categories,evaluation based on ground measurement data and evaluation based on satellite precipitation products.We introduced general evaluation procedure,including obtaining reference data,study area selection and data comparison.The reference datasets mainly include gauge data,Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) datasets and radar data.Finally,we made a prospect on satellite precipitation product evaluation based on the existing problems at present.There currently exist three problems in satellite precipitation products evaluation,imperfect evaluation strategy,non-uniform reference data and evaluation indices.The future research aspects may include optimization of evaluation strategy,normalization of reference data and evaluation methods.