Please wait a minute...
img

官方微信

遥感技术与应用  2004, Vol. 19 Issue (1): 24-29    DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2004.1.24
技术方法     
水稻冠层光谱特征及其与LAI的关系研究
吕雄杰1,潘剑君1,张佳宝2,任红艳1
1.南京农业大学资源与环境学院,江苏南京 210095; 2.中国科学院南京土壤研究所,江苏南京 210008
Study on Relationship between Rice Canopy Spectra and LAI 
LU Xiong-jie1, PAN Jian-jun1, ZHANG Jia-bao2, REN Hong-yan1(1.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Nanjing AgriculturalUniversity,Nanjing210095,China; 2.Nanjing Institute of Soil Science,ChineseAcademy of Sciences,Nanjing210008,China)Abstract:
 全文: PDF 
摘要:

氮素营养是影响作物生长与产量的最主要限制因子之一。准确及时地监测或诊断出作物氮素营养状况,对提高氮素利用效率和作物管理水平、减少过度施氮造成的环境污染具有重要意义。本研究在不同施氮水平处理的水稻试验小区,对水稻整个生长期内冠层反射光谱进行了较系统、密集的测定,同时测定了几个重要生育期水稻的叶面积指数。研究结果表明:随着施氮量的增加,水稻冠层光谱在各生育期间呈现出一定的规律性,在近红外部分(710~1 220 nm),冠层光谱反射率随着施氮水平的提高而升高,而在可见光部分(460~680 nm),水稻冠层的光谱反射率反而逐渐降低。经冠层光谱差异显著性检验发现:水稻灌浆期以前,对施氮水平最为敏感的波段是绿光(560~610 nm)和近红外(710~760 nm)部分;转换为归一化植被指数(NDVI)以后,差异最显著的是(R760-R560)/(R760+R560)。不同氮肥处理的水稻LAI随时间变化曲线大致都呈抛物线型,中低水平施氮肥水稻LAI随时间的变化曲线比较平缓,而高水平施氮肥LAI曲线则变化比较剧烈。冠层光谱反射与叶面积的相关分析结果表明:在水稻抽穗前,叶面积与冠层光谱反射率相关性较差;而抽穗后,叶面积与冠层光谱有较高的相关性。

关键词: 水稻冠层光谱叶面积指数    
Abstract:

N nutrition is one of the uppermost limitation factors for crop growth and yield. Precise andtimely monitoring or detection of crop N nutrient conditions is necessary for improving the efficiency of Nnutrition use and crop management, reducing environmental pollution caused by over nitrogen fertilizer application. In this paper the canopy reflectance spectra during the whole growing period on rice field plotstreated with different nitrogen levels were periodically and continually measured. LAI of rice of severalimportant growing periods was meanwhile measured. The results showed that rice canopy spectralreflectance of different growing periods changed regularly with the increase of nitrogen fertilizerapplication. The canopy spectral reflectance increased in 710~1 220 nm, while decreased in 460~680 nm.The varieties of canopy spectral reflectance under different nitrogen levels were analyzed and compared.The results showed that the canopy spectral reflectance was sensitive to nitrogen levels in 560~610 nmand 710~760 nm before milkfilling. After transforming canopy spectral reflectance to normalizeddifference vegetation index (NDVI), (R760-R560)/(R760+R560) was significantly different underdifferent nitrogen levels. Curves of LAI of rice treated with different nitrogen levels with time were aparabola shape, and the curves of LAI of rice treated with middle and low nitrogen levels changed gentlywhile treated with high nitrogen levels changed acutely. In addition, the correlation coefficient betweenLAI and canopy spectral reflectance was low before the heading period,however, was high after theheading period.

Key words: Rice canopy     Spectrum    LAI
收稿日期: 2003-08-08 出版日期: 2011-12-26
:  TP 79  
基金资助:

 由中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目K2CX2-404和“863”项目2001AA245013资助。

作者简介: 吕雄杰(1977-),男,硕士生,主要从事农业遥感应用方面的研究。
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
吕雄杰1
潘剑君1
张佳宝2
任红艳1

引用本文:

吕雄杰,潘剑君,张佳宝,任红艳. 水稻冠层光谱特征及其与LAI的关系研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2004, 19(1): 24-29.

链接本文:

http://www.rsta.ac.cn/CN/Y2004/V19/I1/24

〔1〕 申广荣,王人潮.植被光谱遥感数据的研究现状及其展望〔J〕.浙江大学学报,27(6):682~690.〔2〕 赵平,孙谷畴,彭少麟.植物氮素营养的生理生态学研究〔J〕.生态科学,1998,(12):34~42.〔3〕 王珂,沈掌泉,王人潮.植物营养胁迫与光谱特性〔J〕.国土资源遥感,1999,(1):9~14.〔4〕 王珂,沈掌泉.不同钾营养水平的水稻冠层和叶片光谱特征研究初报〔J〕.科学通报,1997,(7):211~214〔5〕 Chubachi N R, Asano I, Oikava. The Diagnosis of Nitrogenof Rice Plants Using Chlorophyll meter〔J〕. Jan J Plant SciPlant Nutri, 1986,57:109~193.〔6〕 Takebe M, Yomeyama T, Inada K,et al. Spectral Reflectance Ratio of Rice Canopy for Estimating Crop NitrogenStatus〔J〕. Plant Soil,1990,122:295~297.〔7〕 Turmer F T, Jund M F. Chlorophyll Meter to Predict Nitrogen Topdress Reguirement for Semidwarf R〔J〕. Agron J,1991,83:926~928.〔8〕 Dwyer L M, Tollenaar M, Houwing L. A NondestructiveMethod to Monitor Leaf Greenness in Corn〔J〕. Can J PlantSci, 1991, 71:505~509.〔9〕 Peng S B, Garcia F V, Laza R C,et al. Adjustment forSpecific Leaf Weight Improves Chlorophyll Meter' s Estimateof Rice Leaf Nitrogen Concentration〔J〕. Agron J,1993,85:987~990.〔10〕 Blacker T M, Schepers J S. Use of a Chlorophyll Meter toMonitor N Status and Schedule Fertilization of Corn〔J〕. JProd Agric,1995,8:56~60.〔11〕 Campbell R J, Mobley K N, Marini R P. Growing Conditions Alter the Relationship between SPAD-501 Values andApple Leaf Chlorophyll〔J〕.Hortscience,1990,25:330~331.〔12〕 沈掌泉,王珂,王人潮.水稻冠层光谱反射特性的动态变化研究〔J〕.国土资源遥感,1996,(4):40~44.〔13〕 彭九虎,张树文.基于NDVI与LAI的水稻生长状况研究〔J〕.遥感技术与应用,2002,17(1):12~16.〔14〕 陈述彭,赵英时.遥感地学分析〔M〕.北京:测绘出版社,1992.

[1] 汪子豪,秦其明,孙元亨. 基于BP神经网络的地表温度空间降尺度方法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(5): 793-802.
[2] 石满,陈健,覃帮勇,李盛阳. 天宫二号数据地表温度反演及其在城市群热环境监测中的应用[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(5): 811-819.
[3] 韩涛,潘剑君,张培育,曹罗丹. Sentinel-2A与Landsat-8影像在油菜识别中的差异性研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(5): 890-899.
[4] 高莎,林峻,马涛,吴建国,郑江华. 新疆巴音布鲁克草原马先蒿光谱特征提取与分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(5): 908-914.
[5] 陈伟民,张凌,宋冬梅,王斌,丁亚雄,许明明,崔建勇. 基于AdaBoost改进随机森林的高光谱图像地物分类方法研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(4): 612-620.
[6] 钟函笑,边金虎,李爱农. Landsat-8 OLI与Sentinel-2 MSI山区遥感影像辐射一致性研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(3): 428-438.
[7] 刘振波,邹娴,葛云健,陈健,曹雨濛. 基于高分一号WFV影像的随机森林算法反演水稻LAI[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(3): 458-464.
[8] 苏阳,祁元,王建华,徐菲楠,张金龙. 基于航空高光谱影像的额济纳绿洲土地覆被提取[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(2): 202-211.
[9] 秦振涛,杨茹,张靖,杨武年. 基于聚类结构自适应稀疏表示的高光谱遥感图像修复研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(2): 212-215.
[10] 郭宇柏,卓莉,陶海燕,曹晶晶,王芳. 基于空谱初始化的非负矩阵光谱混合像元盲分解[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(2): 216-226.
[11] 刘爱林,郭宝平,李岩山 . 基于离散粒子群算法的凸多模态高光谱图像端元提取研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(2): 227-232.
[12] 吴兴,张霞,孙雪剑,张立福,戚文超. SPARK卫星高光谱数据辐射质量评价[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(2): 233-240.
[13] 段金亮,王杰,张婷. 一种基于光谱归一化下的植被覆盖度反演算法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(2): 252-258.
[14] 谢京凯,王福民,王飞龙,张东尼. 面向水稻LAI监测的植被指数土壤调节参数修正[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(2): 342-350.
[15] 王光镇,王静璞,邹学勇,韩柳,宗敏. 遥感技术估算非光合植被覆盖度研究综述[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(1): 1-9.