Please wait a minute...
img

官方微信

遥感技术与应用  2007, Vol. 22 Issue (3): 460-465    DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2007.3.460
图像处理     
遥感图像融合定量评价方法及实验研究
黎新亮,赵书河,柯长青,管开宇
(南京大学地理信息科学系,江苏南京 210093)
The Study of Methods of Quantitative Evaluation on Remote Sensing Image Fusion and Actualization
LI Xin-liang, ZHAO Shu-he, KE Chang-qing, GUAN Kai-yu
(Department of Geographical Information Science Nanjing University,Nanjing210093,China)
 全文: PDF 
摘要:

近年来融合技术不断创新,方法多种多样,但是对融合结果缺乏统一的定量评价方法。在分析与总结当前常用的遥感图像融合结果定量评价方法的基础上,给出了亮度信息、空间细节信息和光谱信息等定量评价参数,并且通过程序实现了定量评价。以IHS和PCA两种融合方法对QuickBird图像多光谱波段和全色波段融合作为实验,进行定量评价分析,结果表明所提出的定量评价参数能够较准确地反映图像融合情况,比定性评价有效、全面,可为选择恰当的融合方法提供依据。

关键词: 图像融合定量评价IHS融合PCA融合QuickBird    
Abstract:

With the rapid development of technique on remote sensing image fusion, the methods of fusion have been ameliorated from pixel level to decision level recently.But how to quantificationally evaluate the resultant image impersonality and comprehensively is also a question. This paper brings forward brightness information, spa-texture information and spectrum distortion information by analysing and summarizing current methods of quantitative evaluation on remote sensing image fusion. Those parameters have been actualized via a program.At last,the multi-spectral bands and panchromatic band image of QuickBird sensors are fused with IHS(Intensity-Hue-Saturation)fusion and PCA(Primary Component Analysis)fusion. By evaluation the resultant with the parameters,it shows that quantitative evaluation is more available and comprehensive than qualitative evaluation.So the quantitative evaluation is suitable to evaluate the fused image.And it can support how to choose the appropriate method of image fusion.

Key words: Image fusion    Quantify evaluation    IHS fusion    PCA fusion    QuickBird
收稿日期: 2006-09-29 出版日期: 2011-11-25
:  TP 751   
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目“高分辨率遥感数据决策级融合方法研究”(40501047)资助。

作者简介: 黎新亮(1985-),男,本科生,研究方向为城市遥感与空间分析。
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

黎新亮,赵书河,柯长青,管开宇. 遥感图像融合定量评价方法及实验研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2007, 22(3): 460-465.

LI Xin-liang, ZHAO Shu-he, KE Chang-qing, GUAN Kai-yu. The Study of Methods of Quantitative Evaluation on Remote Sensing Image Fusion and Actualization. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2007, 22(3): 460-465.

链接本文:

http://www.rsta.ac.cn/CN/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2007.3.460        http://www.rsta.ac.cn/CN/Y2007/V22/I3/460

[1] Pohl C, Vangenderen J L. Multisensor Image Fusion in Remote Sensing: Concepts, Methods and Applications[J].Int J Remote Sensing,1998, 19(5):823-854.
[2] Schetselaar E M. Fusion by the IHS Transform: Should We Use Cylindrical or Spherical Coordinates[J].Int J Remote Sensing, 1998, 19(4):759-765.
[3] Chibani Y, Houacine A. The Joint Use of IHS Transform and Redundant Wavelet Decomposition for Fusing Multispectral and Panchromatic Images[J].Int J Remote Sensing, 2002,23(18):3821-3833.
[4] Myungjin Choi,Rae Young Kim, Myeong-Ryong Nam,et al.Fusion of Multispectral and Panchromatic Satellite Images Using the Curvelet Transform[J]. IEEE Geosci &Remote Sensing Letters,2005,2(2):136-140.
[5] Le H′egarat-Mascle S, Richard D, Ottl′e C. Multi-scale Data Fusion Using Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory[J].Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering,2003,10:9-22.
[6] 贾永红,李德仁.SAR与TM影像的IHS变换复合及其质量定量评价[J].国土资源遥感,1997,3:34-39.
[7] 夏明革,何友,欧阳文.像素级图像融合方法与融合效果评价[J].遥感技术与应用,2002,17(4):224-229.
[8] 李弼程,罗剑书.小波分析及其应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2003.
[9] Te-ming Tu, Shun-chi Su, Hsuen-chyun Shyu,et al. A New Look at IHS-like Image Fusion Methods [J]. Information Fusion,2001, 2:177-186.
[10] Chavez P S, Kwarteng A Y.Extracting Spectral Contrast in Landsat Thematic Mapper Image Data Using Selective Principle Component Analysis[J].Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 1989,55(3):339-348.
[11] Yun zhang, Gang Hong. An IHS and Wavelet Integrated Approach to Improve Pan-sharpening Visual Quality of Natural Colour IKONOS and QuickBird Images[J]. Information Fusion,2005,6:225-234.
[12] 徐建达,王洪华.基于IHS变换和小波变换的遥感影像融合[J].测绘学院学报,2002,3(19):198-202.
[13] 肖刚,敬忠良,Henry Leung,等.基于小波统计特性的遥感图像像素与特征联合最优融合方法[J].遥感学报,2004,9(4):381-386.

[1] 肖新耀,许宁,尤红建. 一种基于à trous小波和联合稀疏表示的遥感图像融合方法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2015, 30(5): 1021-1026.
[2] 周艳飞,张绘芳,李霞,杨帆,丁程锋. 基于高分辨遥感数据的胡杨与柽柳树冠提取[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2015, 30(3): 510-517.
[3] 别强,何磊,赵传燕. 基于影像融合和面向对象技术的植被信息提取研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2014, 29(1): 164-171.
[4] 赖格英,曾祥贵,刘影,张玲玲,易发钊,潘瑞鑫,盛盈盈. 基于ETM和图像融合的优势植被冠层叶面积指数和消光系数的遥感反演[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2013, 28(4): 697-706.
[5] 郑中,祁元,张金龙. 基于光谱角和光谱距离评价指标的遥感影像融合方法比较研究——以QuickBird数据为例[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2013, 28(3): 437-443.
[6] 孙萍,邓磊,聂娟. 一种基于区域分割的多尺度遥感图像融合方法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2012, 27(6): 844-849.
[7] 杨先武,蚩志锋,姚高伟. 一种形态重建的遥感影像城市道路提取方法研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2011, 26(6): 758-762.
[8] 薛东剑,张东辉,何政伟,张雪峰. 多源遥感影像融合技术在地质灾害调查中的应用[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2011, 26(5): 664-669.
[9] 王晓艳,刘勇,蒋志勇. 一种基于结构相似度的IHS变换融合算法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2011, 26(5): 670-676.
[10] 陈超,秦其明,池长艳,蒋洪波,刘明超. 一种Curvelet变换和IHS变换相结合的遥感图像融合方法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2011, 26(4): 444-449.
[11] 唐王琴,梁栋,胡根生,马雪亮,杭丹萍. 基于支持向量机的遥感图像厚云去除算法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2011, 26(1): 111-116.
[12] 马友平. 基于变差函数纹理和BP人工神经网络的QuickBird影像分类研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2010, 25(4): 540-546.
[13] 魏伟,赵军,王旭峰. 基于LP和DFB结构的离散Contourlet遥感影像融合算法及在QuickBird中的试验研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2009, 24(3): 362-369.
[14] 刘廷祥,黄丽梅,鲍文东. 基于CBERS-02B和SPOT-5全色波段的图像融合纹理信息评价研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2009, 24(1): 103-108.
[15] 杨培玉,陈圣波,吴琼,吕乐婷,李明军. 城市地区ETM和QUICKBIRD影像NDVI值比较研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2008, 23(5): 533-536.