Please wait a minute...
img

官方微信

遥感技术与应用  2010, Vol. 25 Issue (1): 63-68    DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2010.1.63
研究与应用     
TM与MODIS植被供水指数反演及对比分析
曹广真1,侯 鹏2,范锦龙1,杨 曦2
1.中国气象局中国遥感卫星辐射测量和定标重点开放实验室,国家卫星气象中心,北京 100081;
2.北京师范大学资源学院,北京 100875
VSWI Retrieved and Compared between TM and MODIS
CAO Guang-zhen1,HOU Peng2,FAN Jin-long1,YANG Xi2
1.Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environmental Satellites,China Meteorological Administration,Beijing 100081,China;
2.Resources School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China
 全文: PDF(2570 KB)  
摘要:

为了探讨多源卫星遥感数据针对同一地区同一时刻旱情所得植被供水指数的差异,选择我国华北地区旱灾发生频率较高、影响较广的河北地区为研究区,针对近年来干旱监测应用较为广泛的Landsat TM/ETM+和EOS MODIS数据,分别进行植被供水指数的提取,并进行两者之间的对比分析,得出以下结论:① TM VSWI (Vegetation Supply Water Index) 与MODIS VSWI之间数值上存在一定的差别,变化范围在-0.51~0.20之间。其中负值主要集中在城镇、裸地及水体地表;② 在植被覆盖区,TM的平均VSWI大于MODIS的,但两者差别不大;③ 在各种植被覆盖度条件下,TM VSWI与MODIS VSWI差值的最小值、最大值和均值均表现出随着植被覆盖度的增加,其值逐渐增大的特点。该结论可以为两种遥感数据源干旱监测的差异分析及综合应用提供重要的参考依据。

关键词: 植被供水指数TMMODIS    
Abstract:

In order to present the difference between VSWIes (Vegetation Supply Water Index) retrieved from different remote sensing data,VSWIes abstracted from Landsat TM and EOS MODIS data of Hebei province in North China are calculated and compared.At first,NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) and LST (Land Surface Temperature) are calculated from the two remote sensing sources respectively.And then VSWIes are retrieved and compared.Finally,the following conclusions are be drawn:① On September 8,2004 in the study region,the difference between TM VSWI and MODIS VSWI is changing from \|0.51 to 0.20,and the negative values are mainly happened in towns,bare fields and water bodies; ② In vegetation cover areas,TM VSWI is often bigger than MODIS VSWI,but the difference is little; ③ The minimum,maximum and average values of the difference between TM VSWI and MODIS VSWI present the same trend: the values are increasing with the increase of vegetation coverage.The conclusions of this paper are helpful for recognizing VSWIes difference between TM and MODIS and can provide important information for fusion of the drought indices extracted from the two different sources.

Key words: VSWI    TM    MODIS
收稿日期: 2009-05-04 出版日期: 2011-11-04
基金资助:

863计划项目(2006AA12Z142-1)。

通讯作者: 曹广真 E-mail:caogz@cma.gov.cn   
作者简介: 曹广真(1976-),女,博士,主要从事多源遥感数据融合算法与应用研究。
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
曹广真
侯鹏
范锦龙
杨曦

引用本文:

曹广真, 侯鹏, 范锦龙, 杨曦. TM与MODIS植被供水指数反演及对比分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2010, 25(1): 63-68.

CAO Guang-zhen, HOU Peng, FAN Jin-long, YANG xi. VSWI Retrieved and Compared between TM and MODIS. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2010, 25(1): 63-68.

链接本文:

http://www.rsta.ac.cn/CN/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2010.1.63        http://www.rsta.ac.cn/CN/Y2010/V25/I1/63

[1]Liu Li,Zhou Ying,Yang Feng,et al.Monitoring Drought of Guizhou Using Remote Sensing Vegetation Index[J].Journal of Guizhou Meteorology,1998,22(6):50-54.[刘丽,周颖,杨凤,等.用遥感植被指数监测贵州干旱[J].贵州气象,1998,22(6):50-54.]
[2]Gai Yongqin,Li Xiaobing,Li Xia,et al.Agricultural Drought Monitoring Based on TM and MODIS Remote Sensing Data--A Case Study of Hebei Province[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2008,17(6):91-95.[盖永芹,李晓兵,李霞,等.基于TM与MODIS遥感数据的农业旱情监测--以河北省为例[J].自然灾害学报,2008,17(6):91-95.]
[3]Mo Weihua,Wang Zhenhui,Sun Han,et al.Remote Sensing Monitoring of Farmland Drought Based on Vegetation Supply Water Index[J].Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology,2006,29(3):396-405.[莫伟华,王振会,孙涵,等.基于植被供水指数的农田干旱遥感监测研究[J].南京气象学院学报,2006,29(3):396-405.]
[4]Liang Yun,Zhang Feng,Han Tao.Monitoring Soil Humidity by Using EOS/MODIS VSWI Product in Qingyang[J].Arid Meteorology,2007,25(1):44-47.[梁芸,张峰,韩涛.利用EOS/MODIS植被供水指数监测庆阳地区的土壤湿度[J].干旱气象,2007,25(1):44-47.]
[5]Yang Liping,Wu Rina,Yan Weixiong.Research of Vegetation Supply Water Index to Monitoring of Drought[J].Arid Environmental Monitoring,2007,21(4):226-228.[杨丽萍,乌日娜,闫伟兄.利用植被供水指数法监测干旱的研究[J].干旱环境监测,2007,21(4):226-228.]
[6]Feng Rui,Zhang Yushu,Li Danghong.Monitoring Vegetation Water Content Using AVHRR Data [J].Liaoning Meteorological Quarterly,1998,(4):30-31.[冯锐,张玉书,李党红.利用AVHRR资料监测植被土壤含水量[J].辽宁气象,1998,(4):30-31.]
[7]Sobrino J A,Juan C,Munoza J,et al.Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from Landsat TM 5[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2004,90:434-440.
[8]Price J C.Land Surface Temperature Measurements from the Split Window Channels of the NOAA 7 Advanced very High Resolution Radiometer[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1984,89:7231-7237.
[9]NASA.Landsat 7 Science Data User'S Handbook [EB/OL].Http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov.2005.
[10]Hou Peng,Cao Guangzhen,Jiang Weiguo,et al.Temperature Retrieval of Complex Land Surface with TM and Compared with MODIS Temperature Product [J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2009,18(5):113-118.[侯鹏,曹广真,蒋卫国,等.城市复杂地表TM温度反演及其与MODIS产品的比较 [J].自然灾害学报,2009,18(5):113-118.]
[1] 刘焕军,马雨阳,杨昊轩,姜芸,巩超,吕航. 引入NDVI改进SRTM DEM的新方法[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2021, 36(5): 1083-1091.
[2] 敏玉芳,张耀南,康建芳,冯克庭. 基于MODIS影像的中巴经济走廊荒漠化程度时空动态监测研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2021, 36(4): 827-837.
[3] 王浩天,汪源,袁强强. 2008~2016年MODIS多角度大气校正气溶胶产品在中国的时空分布及变化趋势[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2021, 36(1): 217-228.
[4] 雷华锦,李弘毅,王建,郝晓华,赵宏宇,张娟. 基于环境信息和回归模型的青藏高原MODIS积雪面积比例产品制备[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(6): 1303-1311.
[5] 程雨婷,刘昭华,鹿琳琳,刘士彪,李庆亭. 一带一路沿海超大城市热岛时空特征遥感分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(5): 1197-1205.
[6] 韦海宁,王维真,黄广辉,徐菲楠,冯姣姣,董磊磊. 基于Himawari-8的气溶胶反演研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(4): 797-807.
[7] 李超,李雪梅,田亚林,任瑞. 温度植被干旱指数时空融合模型对比[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(4): 832-844.
[8] 魏石梅, 潘竟虎, 妥文亮. 2015年中国PM2.5浓度遥感估算与时空分布特征[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(4): 845-854.
[9] 董超,赵庚星. 时序数据集构建质量对土地覆盖分类精度的影响研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(3): 558-566.
[10] 龙爽,郭正飞,徐粒,周华真,方伟华,许映军. 基于Google Earth Engine的中国植被覆盖度时空变化特征分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(2): 326-334.
[11] 赵春亮,许文波,范锦龙. FY-3C中分辨率成像光谱仪数据的窄波段地表反照率验证研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 153-162.
[12] 郑贵洲,熊良超,廖艳雯,王红平. 利用MODIS数据反演南海南部海表温度及时空变化分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 132-140.
[13] 王一帆,徐涵秋. 利用MODIS EVI时间序列数据分析福建省植被变化(2000~2017年)[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 245-254.
[14] 徐卫星,薛华柱,靳华安,李爱农. 融合遥感先验信息的叶面积指数反演[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2019, 34(6): 1235-1244.
[15] 冯艾琳,武晋雯,孟莹,姜鹏,董巍,张璇,方缘,刘斌. 基于MODIS GPP数据产品的辽宁省碳源/汇空间格局分布研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2019, 34(4): 857-864.