Please wait a minute...
img

官方微信

遥感技术与应用  2019, Vol. 34 Issue (2): 355-366    DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2019
物候遥感专栏     
基于EVI2和多趋势分析法的高原草地植被物候动态监测研究
陈思宇1,2,梁天刚3
(1.地理国情监测国家测绘地理信息局工程技术研究中心,陕西 西安 710000;
2.国家测绘地理信息局第一航测遥感院,陕西 西安 710000;
3.兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃 兰州 730010)
Dynamic Monitoring of Grassland Vegetation Phenology in Tibetan Plateau based on EVI2 and Three Trend Approaches
Chen Siyu1,2,Liang Tiangang3
(1.National Administration of Surveying,Mapping and Geoinformation Engineering Research Center of Geographic National Conditions Monitoring,Xi’an 710000,China;
2.The First Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,Xi’an 710000,China;
3.College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730010,China)
 全文: PDF(17610 KB)  
摘要: 基于EVI2数据集提取青藏高原草地植被的物候信息,分析青藏高原草地返青期(Start of Growth Season,SOG)、枯黄期(End of Growth Season,EOG)和生长季长度(Length of Growth Season,LOG)的空间分布格局及近30 a来青藏高原草地物候的时空动态变化特征。结果表明:青藏高原的草地物候由东南向西北呈现出明显的区域性差异。其中,高原东部和西北部地区的草地植被返青时间早于中部和西南部地区,而枯黄时间却晚于中部和西南部地区,生长季长度较中部和西南部地区长。同时,青藏高原物候变化趋势在东西部地区的差异十分明显。草地植被返青提前的区域主要集中在高原的东部,提前速率为0.49 d/a(R2=0.54)。草地植被物候分布和变化趋势在不同海拔和坡向上的差异也十分显著。海拔每升高1 000 m,草地SOG推迟4 d,EOG提前5 d,LOG缩短9 d。随海拔的升高,草地SOG的推迟速率逐渐增加,LOG变化速率呈现出逐渐减小的趋势。此外,南坡草地SOG较北坡晚,其LOG较北坡、东坡和西坡的短。北坡草地SOG平均推迟速率低于南坡。

Abstract: Based on grassland vegetation phenology extracting from EVI2 data sets,distribution and dynamic variation characteristic of SOG,EOG and LOG were analyzed in recent 30 years.The results showed that grassland phenology had shown an obvious regional difference from southeast to northwest in TP.The grassland vegetation in eastern and northwestern part of plateau turned green earlier and brown late,with a relatively longer growth season than other regions.The changes of grassland vegetation phenology from 1981 to 2010 in the east and west regions were also remarkable in TP.The Start of Growth Season(SOG) was in advance in eastern region,with the advanced rate of 0.49 d/a(R2=0.54).There were remarkable difference in phenology distribution and changes in different elevations and aspects.When the altitude had risen 1000 m,the SOG delayed 4 days,EOG advanced 5 days,and LOG shorten 9 days.With the increase of altitude,the SOG rate of grassland increased gradually,and LOG change rate showed a decreasing trend.In addition,SOG in south aspect was later than that in north aspect.LOG in south aspect was shorten than that in others.Average delay rate of SOG in north aspect was lower than that in south aspect.

Key words: Tibet plateau    EVI2    Vegetation phenology    Kendall coefficient    Pearson coefficient    Theil-Sen’s median slope
收稿日期: 2018-04-09 出版日期: 2019-05-10
ZTFLH:  TP79  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(31228021),长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT_17R50)资助。

作者简介: 陈思宇(1987-),女,甘肃定西人,工程师,主要从事遥感应用研究。E-mail:15095320573@163.com。
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

陈思宇, 梁天刚. 基于EVI2和多趋势分析法的高原草地植被物候动态监测研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2019, 34(2): 355-366.

Chen Siyu, Liang Tiangang. Dynamic Monitoring of Grassland Vegetation Phenology in Tibetan Plateau based on EVI2 and Three Trend Approaches . Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2019, 34(2): 355-366.

链接本文:

http://www.rsta.ac.cn/CN/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2019        http://www.rsta.ac.cn/CN/Y2019/V34/I2/355

[1] 王树果, 马春锋, 赵泽斌, 魏龙. 基于Sentinel-1及Landsat 8数据的黑河中游农田土壤水分估算[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 13-22.
[2] 张新平,乔治,李皓,闫杰,张芳芳,赵栋锋,王得祥,康海斌,杨航,冯扬. 基于Landsat影像和不规则梯形方法遥感反演延安城市森林表层土壤水分[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 120-131.
[3] 李雷,郑兴明,赵凯,李晓峰,王广蕊. 基于CCI土壤水分产品的干旱指数精度评价及其对东北地区粮食产量的影响[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 111-119.
[4] 郑贵洲,熊良超,廖艳雯,王红平. 利用MODIS数据反演南海南部海表温度及时空变化分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 132-140.
[5] 董世元,张文娟,许君一,马建行. ESTARFM相似像元选取方法的改进研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 185-193.
[6] 刘俊,孟庆岩,葛小三,刘顺喜,陈旭,孙云晓. 基于BP神经网络的夏玉米多生育期叶面积指数反演研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 174-184.
[7] 于丽君,聂跃平,杨林,朱建峰,孙雨,刘芳,高华光. 新疆轮台奎玉克协海尔古城空间考古综合研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 255-266.
[8] 郑宗生,胡晨雨,黄冬梅,邹国良,刘兆荣,宋巍. 基于迁移学习及气象卫星云图的台风等级分类研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 202-210.
[9] 罗家顺,邱建秀,赵天杰,王大刚. 基于Sentinel-1数据的黑河中游土壤水分反演[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 23-32.
[10] 陈家利,郑东海,庞国锦,李新. 基于SMAP亮温数据反演青藏高原玛曲区域土壤未冻水[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 48-57.
[11] 康重阳,赵军,宋国富,包山虎. 基于OMI/OMPS中国季风区大气边界层SO2时空格局分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 233-244.
[12] 陆峥,韩孟磊,卢麾,彭雪婷,蒙莎莎,刘进,杨晓帆. 基于AMSR2多频亮温的黑河流域中上游土壤水分估算研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 33-47.
[13] 王一帆,徐涵秋. 利用MODIS EVI时间序列数据分析福建省植被变化(2000~2017年)[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 245-254.
[14] 胡路,赵天杰,施建成,李尚楠,樊东,王平凯,耿德源,肖青,崔倩,陈德清. 基于地基微波辐射观测的土壤水分反演算法评估[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 74-84.
[15] 陈勇强,杨娜,胡新,佟明远. SMOS与SMAP过境时段表层土壤水分的稳定性研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2020, 35(1): 58-64.